| 34717 |
Q4 comment on how viable BAU is from an ecological perspective. Q2 you needed to explain how to test SGH for indirect interaction such as removing or adding a third species on a gradient |
| 24951 |
|
| 65476 |
Q3 good coverage of ecological concepts but specifics of planning could be improved |
| 47547 |
Q1 correct on application just needed to explain niche in more detail |
| 14500 |
Q3 even planting of different species are a good idea but needed to link to ideas in bold a bit more clearly. I took the two highest and dropped Q4 |
| 50063 |
Q4 needed to link solutions to BAU and ecology |
| 07158 |
Q2 needed to explain how to test it for indirect interactions. |
| 19423 |
Q2 creative answer and for testing you need to do addition and removal similar to direct interactions but use the third species too |
| 30675 |
Q4 solutions were ok but had to link to the BAU a bit better. |
| 23785 |
Q2 needed to provide an experiment such as plug and play of adding or removing a third species |
| 20179 |
Q4 needs to be linked more to ecological principles and solutions better explained. |
| 10646 |
over page limits. Q4 needed to link BAU to ecology and comment on viability |
| 27460 |
Q3 is good but could have linked to a more specific recommendation or set of for the park |
| 21146 |
Q4 does the BAU model address ecology well enough or will it work in time from what we know about the ecology of the planet |
| 20701 |
Q3 solutions are good but needed to link to concepts in course. Q4 same you did not link to the question about BAU |
| 55707 |
Q3 good ecology but needed to give them a set of clear recommendations on how to manage for best ecological function |
| 72782 |
Q5 management suggestions are correct but need to link to ecology more directly and have a more tangible plant versus insect recommendation for the university. |
| 96825 |
needed a better plan for Downsview |
| 71146 |
Q5 provide a specific set of suggestions to the university |
| 28425 |
Q1 needed to explain how cheat changed the realized niche |
| 34910 |
Q2 needed to propose an experimental method to test such as plug and play and remove the third species |
| 36693 |
Q4 link BAU consquences to ecological principles |
| 41862 |
Q1, needed to explain vioation in terms of niche theory, Q2 did not explain how you would test for indirect interactions and stress specifically, change stress and change the third species and see how net outcomes change |
| 01307 |
Q1 confusing and needed to link specific recommendations to those ecological principles |
| 70101 |
Q2 explain in your experiment that you remove third species to test indirect versus direct interactions |
| 42525 |
Q3 summary good but needed to provide the park with tangible and actionable advice |
| 18526 |
Q3, solutions are good, Q2, nanny good idea but indirect interactions involve three species but I guess you mean nanny to kids, a bit confusing but I like the analogy |
| 57625 |
|
| 02907 |
Q1 good application but needed to explain niche more thoroughly |
| 11672 |
Good concept coverage but could have made the application more specific in each instance such as how the BAU and ecology interact |
| 94781 |
Q4 need to examine BAU viability |
| 05000 |
Q2 needed to explain how to test explicitly such as stating you must add or remove third species and Q4 linke BAU to ecology directly |
| 68283 |
Q3 good concepts but besides recommendations on how to sample you needed to provide a management recommendation specifically |
| 21016 |
not enough focus on a logical solution set in each Q |
| 86777 |
Q3 good explanation and need to have specific design recommendations to those principles |
| 80881 |
Q1 need to explain how VW cheated on realized niche. Q2 explain how to test with an experiment such as plug and play |
| 55130 |
Q3 good recommendations just needed to link to the definitions a bit better |
| 23060 |
|
| 94653 |
Q3 background good but needed to provide them with a real plan |
| 44295 |
Q4 – comment viability of solutions too, not bad, but needed a bigger picture on how to use ecology to temper some of those solutions |
| 31364 |
Q3 concepts are well described but recommendations are not clear enough or specific. Q4 needed a lot more detail |
| 68944 |
Q2 what species would you remove the third one plus propose a specific experiment |
| 34903 |
Q3 recommendations to park could be improved |
| 95116 |
Q2 concepts great, experiment has to be linked to indirect interactions involving three species though and it is a bit confusing, nice analogy to Korra!! love that |
| 48669 |
Q1 good application. Q2 just had to lay out the experimental design for three species more clearly to decouple direct from indirect interactions within the network |
| 85854 |
Q4 solutions needed to be linked to BAU not just little things people can do. |
| 05375 |
Q1 explain they cheated on realized niche |
| 09112 |
Q1 invoked tradeoffs and state fundamental versus realized niche |
| 84438 |
Q2 needed a specific experiment Q5 needed more detail and recommendations |
| 93825 |
Q1 car as species and niche of each is correct but just needed to explain more clearly |
| 85573 |
Q2 indirect is not a third factor but a third species Q1 needed to apply niche to different kinds of cars and thatr VW cheated to make niche seem bigger than it is |
| 95095 |
Q3 specific recommendations needed for the park |
| 09456 |
Q2 needed to link principles from ecology to BAU |
| 07976 |
Q4 BAU needed to be linked to the ecological principles |
| 72179 |
Q5 curves could be explained more clearly |
| 24851 |
Q2, indirect interactions involve three species |
| 16773 |
|
| 68326 |
Q3, did not link to ecology. Q4 solutions are ok but did not link to BAU |
| 81762 |
Q2 was not clear how you test for indirect versus direct interactions |
| 05173 |
Q3 summary good but needed to provide a specific plan |
| 12906 |
Q3 needed to have a specific recommendation for the park or a plan |
| 43194 |
Q4 comment in viability at a global scale of BAU and ecological principles |
| 86373 |
Q4 BAU linked to ecology is needed. Q2 confusing and needed to provide an experiment such as plug and play and remove a third species on a gradient |
| 21097 |
Q2 experiment was unclear in that you need to state you remove third species to compare direct and indirect interactions on a gradient |
| 95049 |
|
| 02012 |
|
| 46939 |
Q3 link to ecology more clearly. Q4 solutions are correct but not linked to BAU. |
| 31814 |
Q3 good concepts but need to provide a specific recommendation |
| 99763 |
Q1 need to explain that realized niche was violated. Q2 needed to explain how to test for indirect interactions on gradients by removing the third species |
| 03953 |
Q3. bit more focus on using ecology explicitly to plan a park and ecological rationale for design |
| 53035 |
Q1 excellent link to niche concept violation |
| 31078 |
Q2 more detail needed in concepts and experimental design. Q4 link to BAU missing |
| 17987 |
Q3 needed to explain fundamental versus realized and the concepts of tradeoffs in that one species cannot be everything |
| 48264 |
Q3 needed to be make specific recommendations from the ecological ideas listed in bold. |
| 85318 |
Q1 explain how hey violated the realized niche |
| 10568 |
Q2 explain how you remove third species to differentiate between direct and indirect interactions between a set of species |
| 35268 |
Q4 needed to link ecology to the BAU |
| 18366 |
Q1 good description just needed to link to niche more directly |
| 28552 |
Q2 experiment needed to include adding or removing the third species like the deer in your example or measuring them on a gradient with and without the tree species |
| 72964 |
Q4 excellent concepts summarized just needed to make the link between concepts and BAU a but more directly int terms of viability |
| 56656 |
Q1 needed to better link of car cheat code to type of car such as fuel efficient and powerful in that you cannot be both. Q4 I did not understand you interpretation of how eccology links to the BAU |
| 89700 |
Q4 summary great but needed to explore viability of BAU from an ecological perspective |
| 90985 |
Q3 solutions are good. |
| 19315 |
|
| 99093 |
Q1 nice ideas on niche types. needed to explain that the realized niche was only possible via a cheat code and that a single car or species cannot be good at everything such as trade-offs |
| 38559 |
Q2 link to indirect interactions better and less focus on direct and also explain how to test more clearly. Q5 needed more active management for the campus besides sampling |
| 90846 |
Q1 needed to link car to niche and general rules of how a system works in that you cannot both have fundamental and realized be exact the same AND that they were selling both fuel efficient and power |
| 73434 |
Q4 good description of concepts but needed to commment on viability of solutions |
| 98782 |
Q4 summary is good but need to comment on BAU viability from an ecological perspective |
| 53106 |
Q4 solutions are great. well done. |
| 74864 |
Q4 you are ok on summary but explanation of whether BAU will work from an ecological perspective was needed |
| 35964 |
Q4 needed to evaluate BAU |
| 48295 |
Q4, solutions you list need to be linked to ecology and also the BAU. Q1 excellent linkages |
| 87389 |
Q1 good but needed to state realized niche versus fundamental from ecology lectures |
| 45094 |
Q3 need specific recomendations that were linked to ecological principles |
| 93681 |
Q2 unclear how this experiment would test direct from indirect interactions and also on a gradient. More detail also needed for SGH |
| 60191 |
Q3 more specific recommendations needed |
| 94353 |
|
| 10995 |
Q4 anthropocene description unclear but solutions are accurate |
| 61376 |
Q3 invasive species do need to be managed. just needed to link to the ecological ideas in bold from question more clearly to provide the park with concrete recommendations. |
| 96060 |
Q4 BAU viability from an ecological perspective need to be explained |
| 43830 |
Q4 link between ecology and recommendation better articulated |
| 72995 |
Q5 yes sampling and educating are great. Specific recommendations to the university are needed though given what you found for plants and insect |
| 21166 |
no clear plan for Downsview. also not linked to what your learned enough. |
| 32240 |
Q5 in addition to sampling what would you recommend for the unverisity to manage for higher diversity. No second answer provided |
| 82507 |
instructions were single-spaced and single page per answer. Q5 you mention basic concepts but need to make specific recommendations based on those principles |
| 93389 |
Q2 good example of indirect interactions |
| 17398 |
single-spaced text please as per instructions. Q1 needed to explain they violated the realized niche |
| 60377 |
Q1 need to link to niche. No second answer provided in the single document |
| 80563 |
over page limit (no penalty but please ensure it fits next time). Q4 good job. |
| 54602 |
Q1, yes, true but needed to explain fundamental versus realized |
| 34307 |
Q2 more detail needed and better explanation of how to test with an experiment |
| 60948 |
great answer for Q4, comment on viablility of BAU even more broadly applied |
| 68523 |
Q3 specific recommendations needed to promote biodiversity |
| 79772 |
Q2 indirect interactions include a third species and the experiment is that you add or remove that species. I see you bacteria listed but the design is confusing |
| 35997 |
|
| 58588 |
not called holocene but anthropocene, solutions ok but need to link to business more directly |
| 37637 |
Q3 general suggestions are good could be linked to ecological theory more directly |
| 23249 |
Q4 good call on viablity assessment. Q3 concepts well explained but not linked to a plan |
| 72116 |
Q3 more detail needed. Q4 same you needed to link to what we read and discussed in class please and also discuss BAU and ecology |
| 60862 |
Q3 recomendation coiuld be more linked to the ecological principles and the ecological ideas more clearly explained in a bit more detail |
| 44698 |
Q1 needed to apply niche to species of cars. you are correct on ecological implications but this was not the question Q2 need to explain that you remove the third species to test for indirect interactions and also a gradient |
| 20857 |
Q1 needed to explain niche more clearly and how VW cheated to change realized niche |
| 80794 |
Q3, needed to provide them a plan to mitigate or address some of the ecology you explainged |
| 09088 |
Q4 solutions are all good just needed to link them to ecology a bit more |
| 96601 |
Q4 needed to link the ecology to the BAU |
| 55757 |
Q2 good job and explained you need C or three species. |
| 36624 |
Q1 you are correct on consequences for sure but needed to link to niche such as fundamental and realized hard to be the same and the cheat code allowed them to market a car that had it all and it did not |
| 70427 |
needed more focus on the practical solutions but descriptions of ecology concepts was good |
| 83240 |
Q1 the penalty idea is cool and I liked that idea. However it was supposed to be linked to the niche concept not cheaters. Cool though. |
| 57077 |
Q2 comment on viability of BAU from an ecological perspective such as is it good enough and fast enough to make a difference or save species |
| 44009 |
Q2 needed explicit plan or recommendations, also instructions clearly stated one page, single-spaced text |
| 65535 |
Q1 needed additional explanation. Q4 needed to discuss BAU and link directly to ecology |
| 08932 |
Q1 needed to explain niche better, application was good. Q2 scored higher than Q4 SO USED THAT. |
| 64841 |
Q2 explain how to test SGH with indirect interactions more clearly and was supposed to be single-spaced too |
| 73525 |
Q4 good summary |
| 99564 |
Q3, good but need to providfe them with a specific plan or at least recommendations |
| 14969 |
Q4 need to talk about more than just limits but also rewards too and consider a maxim |
| 40597 |
Good answers just make recommendations a bit more specific in Q5 |
| 82342 |
Q1 you are absolutely correct on consequences however you needed to link violation to the concept of niche specifically realized |
| 24331 |
Q4 needed to discuss BAU and viability and link to ecology |
| 95406 |
Q4 did not fully explain how to test indirect interactions with three species ensuring you decouple direct from indirect interactions |
| 20745 |
Q4 good solutions and good link to ecology |
| 82352 |
Q1 needed to invoke specific ecological principles in bold in question and also link to BAU |
